[1]李天林,余薇,陈亮,等.肺部穿刺活检联合血清SCC、CEA、NSE诊断肺癌的价值[J].福建医药杂志,2021,43(03):26-29.
　LI Tianlin,YU Wei,CHEN Liang,et al.Value of lung biopsy combined with SCC,CEA and NSE in the diagnosis of lung cancer[J].FUJIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL,2021,43(03):26-29.
点击复制

肺部穿刺活检联合血清SCC、CEA、NSE诊断肺癌的价值()
分享到：

《福建医药杂志》[ISSN:1002-2600/CN:35-1071/R]

卷:
43
期数:
2021年03期
页码:
26-29
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2021-06-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Value of lung biopsy combined with SCC,CEA and NSE in the diagnosis of lung cancer
文章编号:
1002-2600(2021)03-0026-04
作者:
李天林; 余薇; 陈亮; 李远鹏; 黄馨莹; 许东平; 刘俊安
华侨大学附属厦门长庚医院呼吸与危重症医学科(厦门 361028)
Author(s):
LI Tianlin;  YU Wei;  CHEN Liang;  LI Yuanpeng;  HUANG Xinying;  XU Dongping;  LIU Junan
Department of Respiratory,Xiamen Changgeng Hospital Affiliated to Huaqiao University,Xiamen, Fujian 361028, China
关键词:
肺部穿刺活检;  鳞癌抗原;  癌胚抗原;  肺癌;  临床价值
Keywords:
lung biopsy;  SCC;  CEA;  lung cancer;  clinical value
分类号:
R734.2
文献标志码:
B
摘要:
目的 探讨肺部穿刺活检联合鳞癌抗原(SCC)、癌胚抗原(CEA)、神经元特异度烯醇化酶(NSE)检测诊断肺癌的价值分析。方法 选取本院2016年1月至2020年4月就诊的90例确诊肺癌患者为观察组,选取同时期来院就诊的90例肺部良性病变患者及90例健康体检者分别作为良性组与对照组,比较3组血清SCC、CEA、NSE水平,同时分析观察组不同病理类型、分期上述指标的差异,分析肺部穿刺活检、血清SCC、CEA、NSE单独及联合检测在肺癌诊断中的价值。结果 观察组血清SCC、CEA、NSE水平均高于良性组及对照组(P<0.05); 肺鳞癌者血清SCC水平较肺腺癌及小细胞肺癌明显升高(P<0.05); 小细胞肺癌者血清NSE水平较肺腺癌及肺鳞癌明显升高(P<0.05); 肺腺癌者血清CEA水平较肺鳞癌及小细胞肺癌明显升高(P<0.05); 周围型肺癌穿刺活检阳性率为94.64%,并发症发生率为25.56%; 穿刺活检联合SCC、CEA、NSE检测诊断肺癌的敏感度95.56%,特异度100%。结论 肺部穿刺活检诊断周围型肺癌阳性率高,并发症少,联合SCC、CEA、NSE检测能提高诊断肺癌的敏感度与特异度,具有较高临床价值。
Abstract:
Objective To study the value of lung biopsy combined with SCC,CEA and NSE in the diagnosis of lung cancer.Methods Ninety patients with lung cancer in our hospital from January 2016 to April 2020 were selected as the observation group, and 90 patients with pulmonary benign disease and 90 healthy persons were selected as benign group and control group respectively.The serum levels of SCC, CEA and NSE in the three groups were compared, and the differences of the above indexes in different pathological types and stages of the observation group were analyzed, and the value of lung biopsy and serum three separate and combined detection in the diagnosis of lung cancer was analyzed.Results The serum levels of SCC, CEA and NSE in the observation group were higher than those in the benign group or the control group(P<0.05); the serum SCC level of patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma was significantly higher than that of lung adenocarcinoma and small cell lung cancer(P<0.05); the serum NSE level of small cell lung cancer was significantly higher than that of lung adenocarcinoma and small cell lung cancer(P<0.05); the serum CEA level of lung adenocarcinoma was significantly higher than that of lung squamous cell carcinoma and small cell lung cancer(P<0.05).The positive rate of biopsy was 94.64% and the incidence of complications was 25.56%.The sensitivity and specificity of biopsy combined with SCC, CEA and NSE were 95.56% and 100%, respectively.Conclusion Lung biopsy has high positive rate and less complications in the diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer.Combined detection of SCC, CEA and NSE can improve the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis of lung cancer, and has high clinical value.

参考文献/References:

[1] 孟娜, 钟媛, 刘珊珊,等.晚期肺癌患者症状群及生活质量的调查及相关性分析[J]. 临床肺科杂志, 2018, 23(3):52-56.
[2] 黄文铖, 黄馨莹, 郑建明,等.CT定位下活检联合血清肿瘤标志物检测对周围型肺癌的诊断价值分析[J]. 海军医学杂志, 2019, 40(5):459-462,467.
[3] 袁刚, 王江涛, 陈鹏.低剂量CT引导经皮肺穿刺活检术联合肿瘤标志物对肺癌的诊断价值[J]. 医学影像学杂志, 2017, 27(11):2102-2105.
[4] 邹春华, 黄涛金, 谢勇久,等.CT引导下肺穿刺活检诊断肺部肿瘤[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2016, 24(12):1912-1914.
[5] 王晓娟, 散琴, 王月明,等.CEA,CA125,SCC-Ag,CA199及CYFRA21-1等肿瘤标志物在宫颈癌中诊断的价值和意义[J]. 海南医学院学报, 2017, 23(18):2573-2576.
[6] 张晓霞.5种血清肿瘤标志物在肺癌辅助诊断中的应用价值[J]. 国际检验医学杂志, 2017,38(14):1928-1930.
[7] 刘颖, 李华强, 罗治海, 等.CEA、NSE、CYFRA21-1联合检测对肺癌的早期诊断价值[J]. 医学综述, 2016, 22(9):1774-1776.

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-06-15