[1]吴道明 朱 琳 林 芸 张丽华 吴松松 林 宁.光散射成像预测乳腺浸润性癌腋窝淋巴结转移的作用[J].福建医药杂志,2019,41(05):16-19.
　WU Daoming,ZHU Lin,LIN Yun,et al.Assessing prediction of axillary lymph node status in invasive breast carcinoma by using diffuse optical tomography[J].FUJIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL,2019,41(05):16-19.
点击复制

光散射成像预测乳腺浸润性癌腋窝淋巴结转移的作用()
分享到：

《福建医药杂志》[ISSN:1002-2600/CN:35-1071/R]

卷:
41
期数:
2019年05期
页码:
16-19
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2019-10-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Assessing prediction of axillary lymph node status in invasive breast carcinoma by using diffuse optical tomography
文章编号:
1002-2600(2019)05-0016-04
作者:
吴道明 朱 琳1 林 芸 张丽华 吴松松 林 宁
福建医科大学省立临床医学院 福建省立医院超声科(福州 350001)
Author(s):
WU Daoming; ZHU Lin; LIN Yun; ZHANG Lihua; WU Songsong; LIN Ning
Department of Ultrasonography, Fujian Provincial Hospital,Provincial Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University,Fuzhou,Fujian 350001,China
关键词:
超声;  光散射成像系统;  乳腺肿瘤;  淋巴结
Keywords:
ultrasound;  diffuse optical tomography;  breast tumor;  lymph node
分类号:
R445.1; R737.9
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨光散射成像系统在预测浸润性乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移中的作用。方法 病理确诊为浸润性乳腺癌的141例分为腋窝淋巴结转移组和腋窝淋巴结未转移组,评价术前超声光散射检查肿瘤的各参数(SDI,HBT,SO2)值的差异,通过ROC曲线获得预测腋窝淋巴结转移的阈值,分析超声结合DOT 系统对提高腋窝淋巴结转移诊断准确性的意义。结果 141例浸润性乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结转移82例,未转移59例,组间SDI、HBT值比较的差异有统计学意义(P=0.007,P=0.002,P<0.01),而患者年龄与SO2值组间比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.83,P=0.712)。ROC曲线得出SDI、HBT诊断阈值为211.00,212.50。超声联合SDI和超声联合HBT诊断腋窝淋巴结转移的敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、AUC分别为:92.68%、94.92%、93.61%、96.20%、90.32%、0.933和91.46%、94.91%、92.91%、96.15%、88.89%、0.925,优于单独使用超声诊断的74.12%、89.83%、82.27%、91.30%、76.61%、0.825。结论 结合SDI和HBT值可帮助提高超声诊断腋窝淋巴结转移的准确性。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the value of diffused optical tomography(DOT)in predicting metastasis of axillary lymph of invasive breast cancer.Methods In total, 141 patients of invasive breast carcinoma were divided into two groups: lymph node-positive and lymph node-negative According to histology.The differences of DOT finding of SDI,HBT,and SO2 was compared between the two groups.Obtain cutoff count of diagnosing axillary metastasis through ROC analysis.Study the value ofultrasound combine with DOT in improving the diagnostic accuracy of axillary lymph node metastasis was analyzed.Results The patients of invasive breast cancer were divided into two groups:metastasis in 82 patients and none metastasis in 59 patients.There were significant differences in SDI,HBT and size between the two groups(P=0.007,P=0.002,P<0.01),and no significant differences in age and SO2(P=0.83,P=0.712).The ROC curve showed that diagnostic threshdds of SDI and HBT were 211.00 and 212.50 in diagnosing of axillary metastasis.The sensitivity,specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value,AUC of ultrasound with SDI and ultrasound with HBT were 92.68%,94.92%,93.61%,96.20%,90.32%,0.933 and 91.46%,94.91%,92.91%,96.15%,88.89%,0.925,and significantly greater than those of ultrasound alone(74.12%,89.83%,82.27%,91.30%,76.61%,0.825).Conclusion Combining SDI and HBT values can improve the accuracy of ultrasound diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastasis.

参考文献/References:

[1] Yang X N,Wu Y L.RECIST—New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors[J].The Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine,2004,4(2):85-90.
[2] Liu M,Yang Y,Xie F,et al.Could axillary clearance be avoided in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients with positive nodes diagnosed by ultrasound guided biopsy in the post-ACOSOG Z0011 era?[J]. PLoS One, 2019,14(1):e0210437.
[3] Gradishar W J,Anderson B O,Balassanian R,et al.NCCN Guidelines insights: Breast Cancer,version 1.2017[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw,2017,15(4):433-451.
[4] Cho N,Moon W K,Han W,et al.Preoperative sonographic classification of axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer: node-to-node correlation with surgical histology and sentinel node biopsy results[J].AJR 2009,193(6):1731-1737.
[5] Moore A, Hester M, Nam MW,et al.Distinct lymph nodal sonographic characteristics in breast cancer patients at high risk for axillary metastases correlate with the final axillary stage[J]. Br J Radiol,2008; 81(968):630-636.
[6] Mohammed R A, Ellis I O, Elsheikh S,et al.Lymphatic and angiogenic characteristics in breast cancer: morphometric analysis and prognostic implications[J].Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2009,113(2):261-273.
[7] 王红磊,武力,阙燕.超声光散射断层成像与乳腺癌微血管密度的相关性研究[J].中山大学学报,2011,32(4):531-536.
[8] Zhu Q,Xiao M,You Sh,et al.Ultrasound-guided diffuse optical tomography(DOT)of invasive breast carcinoma: Does tumour total haemoglobin concentration contribute to the prediction of axillary lymph node status? [J].European Journal of Radiology,2012,81(11):3185-3189.

相似文献/References:

[1]尹冠群,曾艳,周戎君,等.超声光散射成像对乳腺肿瘤诊断价值分析[J].福建医药杂志,2017,39(4):127.
[2]卢希,林树英,林芩,等.超声引导下喉上神经内支阻滞对喉罩全麻后咽喉痛的影响[J].福建医药杂志,2017,39(4):137.
[3]郑婉静,陈国忠.围术期超声引导下星状神经节阻滞的研究进展[J].福建医药杂志,2017,39(4):155.
[4]聂立雄 邱全明 张其旺 吴晓丹.罗哌卡因复合右美托咪定用于腹横肌平面阻滞对剖宫产术后静脉镇痛效果的影响[J].福建医药杂志,2017,39(5):29.
[5]李学山.超声引导下腰丛坐骨神经阻滞在髋关节置换术的应用效果观察[J].福建医药杂志,2017,39(5):75.
[6]陈琳.超声引导下肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞在上肢清创手术中的应用[J].福建医药杂志,2017,39(5):111.
[7]邱秀萍,张志承,黄汝哨,等.超声引导下甲状腺囊肿聚桂醇硬化治疗40例效果分析[J].福建医药杂志,2021,43(01):77.
[8]朱艺霞,王明虹.超声引导下头部周围神经阻滞在开颅手术中的应用[J].福建医药杂志,2021,43(02):18.
　ZHU Yixia,WANG Minghong.Application of ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block in craniotomy[J].FUJIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL,2021,43(05):18.
[9]涂文劭,郑艇,陈江湖,等.术前超声引导髂筋膜间隙阻滞持续镇痛在老年髋部骨折患者中的应用[J].福建医药杂志,2021,43(03):4.
　TU Wenshao,ZHENG Ting,CHEN Jianghu,et al.Application of preoperative ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block for continuous analgesia in elderly patients with hip fracture[J].FUJIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL,2021,43(05):4.
[10]黄洁,王翠兰.染色体微阵列分析技术在超声异常胎儿产前遗传学诊断中的应用价值[J].福建医药杂志,2022,44(04):5.
　HUANG Jie,WANG Cuilan.Application value of chromosome microarray analysis in prenatal genetic diagnosis of abnormal fetus detected by ultrasound[J].FUJIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL,2022,44(05):5.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:福建省卫生计生委青年科研课题(2015-1-3) 1 通信作者,Email:15980246406@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-10-15