[1]龚 峥,林世荣,钱 欣.实时反馈装置在非急重症医务人员心肺复苏培训中的作用[J].福建医药杂志,2021,43(02):7-11.
 GONG Zheng,LIN Shirong,QIAN Xin.Effects of real-time feedback devices on cardiopulmonary resuscitation training in non-intensive medical staffs[J].FUJIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL,2021,43(02):7-11.
点击复制

实时反馈装置在非急重症医务人员心肺复苏培训中的作用()
分享到:

《福建医药杂志》[ISSN:1002-2600/CN:35-1071/R]

卷:
43
期数:
2021年02期
页码:
7-11
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2021-04-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of real-time feedback devices on cardiopulmonary resuscitation training in non-intensive medical staffs
文章编号:
1002-2600(2021)02-0007-05
作者:
龚 峥林世荣钱 欣1
福建医科大学省立临床医学院 福建省立医院急诊科 福建省急诊医学重点实验室(福州 350001)
Author(s):
GONG Zheng LIN Shirong QIAN Xin
Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Provincial Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350001, China
关键词:
院内心脏骤停 心肺复苏 非急重症医务人员 培训 反馈装置 按压质量
Keywords:
in-hospital cardiac arrest cardiopulmonary resuscitation non-intensive medical staff training feedback device compression quality
分类号:
R459.7
文献标志码:
B
摘要:
目的 探讨实时反馈装置对非急重症医务人员实施心肺复苏培训的影响。方法 纳入某三甲医院非急重症医务人员共353人,同时随机挑选45名工作1年及以上急诊及重症医学科医务人员作为对照组。按照《2020年AHA心肺复苏及心血管急救指南》培训,以模拟人为对象进行3轮心肺复苏培训,3轮按先后顺序分别定义为S1、S2、S3,每组按压时间为2 min。S1无任何提示并与对照组进行比较,S2及S3在按压过程中均根据实时反馈装置对按压质量包括按压深度、频率、回弹情况进行修正,以上数据均通过无线网络信号传输并收集。结果 非急重症医务人员心肺复苏按压质量较急重症医务人员差,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。非急重症医务人员在按压深度、按压频率、按压准确率及按压分数方面,S2、S3均优于S1,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 非急重症医务人员心肺复苏按压质量较急重症医护人员低,实时反馈装置有助于改善培训效果,提高按压质量水平。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the effects of real-time feedback devices on cardiopulmonary resuscitation(CPR)training in non-intensive medical staffs.Methods A total of 353 non-intensive medical staffs were included and trained according to 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.A total of 45 doctors, who had at least one year of Emergency or critical care department work experience, were selected as control group.Two-minutes CPR performance was tested on a manikin for three rounds.S1 was tested without any feedback devices and compared with control group.In S2 and S3, a real-time feedback device(Link CPR)was used to improve compression quality(include compression depth,rate and rebound of chest wall).All compression data was collected via wireless network.Results The non-intensive medical staffs tend to perform CPR worse than intensive medical staffs(P<0.05).For the non-intensive medical staffs,S2 and S3 achieved a significantly superior performance than S1 in terms of chest compression depth,rate,accuracy and fraction(P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with the emergency or intensive medical staffs, the quality of CPR in non-intensive medical staffs is far from satisfactory.Real-time feedback devices can improve effect of training and quality of chest compression.

参考文献/References:

[1] Morrison L J, Neumar R W, Zimmerman J L, et al.Strategies for improving survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United States: 2013 consensus recommendations: a consensus statement from the American Heart Association[J]. Circulation,2013,127(14):1538-1563.
[2] Panchal A R, Bartos J A, Cabañas J G, et al.Part 3: Adult basic and advanced life support: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care[J]. Circulation,2020,142(16_suppl_2):S366-S468.
[3] Bhanji F, Finn J C, Lockey A, et al.Part 8: Education, implementation, and teams: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations[J]. Circulation,2015,132(16 Suppl 1):S242-S268.
[4] Edelson D P, Litzinger B, Arora V, et al.Improving in-hospital cardiac arrest process and outcomes with performance debriefing[J]. Arch Intern Med,2008,168(10):1063-1069.
[5] Couper K, Kimani P K, Abella B S, et al.The system-wide effect of real-time audiovisual feedback and postevent debriefing for in-hospital cardiac arrest: the cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality improvement initiative[J]. Crit Care Med,2015,43(11):2321-2331.
[6] Couper K, Mason A J, Gould D, et al.The impact of resuscitation system factors on in-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes across UK hospitals: An observational study[J]. Resuscitation,2020,151:166-172.
[7] Parra D A, Totapally B R, Zahn E, et al.Outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a pediatric cardiac intensive care unit[J]. Crit Care Med,2000,28(9):3296-3300.
[8] Fukuda T, Ohashi-Fukuda N, Inokuchi R, et al.Timing of intravenous epinephrine administration during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest [DB/OL].Shock,2021-01-21.
[9] Perman S M, Stanton E, Soar J,et al.Location of in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United States-variability in event rate and outcomes[J]. J Am Heart Assoc,2016,5(10):1-7.
[10] Mondrup F, Brabrand M, Folkestad L, et al.In-hospital resuscitation evaluated by in situ simulation: a prospective simulation study[J]. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med,2011,19:55.
[11] Wolfe H, Zebuhr C, Topjian A A, et al.Interdisciplinary ICU cardiac arrest debriefing improves survival outcomes[J]. Crit Care Med,2014,42(7):1688-1695.
[12] Malik A O, Nallamothu B K, Trumpower B, et al.Association between hospital debriefing practices with adherence to resuscitation process measures and outcomes for in-hospital cardiac arrest[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes,2020,13(11):e006695.
[13] Crowley C P, Wan E S, Salciccioli J D, et al.The use of mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation may be associated with improved outcomes over manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation during inhospital cardiac arrests[J]. Crit Care Explor,2020,2(11):e0261.
[14] Sutton R M, Wolfe H, Nishisaki A, et al.Pushing harder, pushing faster, minimizing interruptions… but falling short of 2010 cardiopulmonary resuscitation targets during in-hospital pediatric and adolescent resuscitation[J]. Resuscitation,2013,84(12):1680-1684.
[15] Cheng A, Overly F, Kessler D, et al.Perception of CPR quality: Influence of CPR feedback, Just-in-Time CPR training and provider role[J]. Resuscitation,2015,87:44-50.
[16] Wang J C, Tsai S H, Chen Y H, et al.Kinect-based real-time audiovisual feedback device improves CPR quality of lower-body-weight rescuers[J]. Am J Emerg Med,2018,36(4):577-582.
[17] Lin Y, Cheng A, Grant V J, et al.Improving CPR quality with distributed practice and real-time feedback in pediatric healthcare providers- A randomized controlled trial[J]. Resuscitation,2018,130:6-12.
[18] Miller A C, Scissum K, McConnell L, et al.Real-time audio-visual feedback with handheld nonautomated external defibrillator devices during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest: A meta-analysis[J]. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci,2020,10(3):109-122.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:福建省科技计划社会发展引导性(重点)项目(2017Y0014)
1 通信作者,Email:qx9398@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-04-15